Patna High CourtCWJC/8573/2015withdrawn

Navin Kumar Tiwari And ANR v. The Chairman Cum Managing Director Bihar State Power Holding Co. Ltd. And ORS

2015-06-23Mr. Justice Mihir Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8573 of 2015 ====================================================== 1.Navin Kumar Tiwari , son of Nand Kishore Tiwari, Residing at F-4/5 BHEL Colony at and P.O. Khabra, PS Sadar (Muzaffarpur), District Muzaffarpur.

2.Md. Nurul Haque son of Md. Fazlul Haque, residing at DN/1, Grid Colony, Muzaffarpur, District Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.The Chairman Cum Managing Director Bihar State Power ( Holding) Co. Ltd., Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna, P.S. Kotwali, District Patna. 2.The Managing Director, Bihar State Power Transmission Co. Ltd., Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna, P.S Kotwali, District Patna. 3.The Director (Administration), Bihar State Power (Holding) Co. Ltd., Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna, P.S Kotwali, District Patna. 4.The General Manager cum Chief Engineer, Transmission Zone, Muzaffarpur, PS Sadar Muzaffarpur, District Muzaffarpur. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anish Chandra, Adv For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, Adv ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA ORAL JUDGMENT 23-06-2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Having regard to the fact that the petitioners are the employees of erstwhile Bihar State Electricity Board now known as Bihar State Power (Holding) Company Ltd., and are admittedly workman have grievance as with regard to their condition including the claim of promotion/designation has to be raised before the appropriate competent authority under the Labour Law and/or Labour Court.

Patna High Court CWJC No.8573 of 2015 (2) dt.23-06-2015 When such an observation has been made, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application in order to enable the petitioners to seek remedy under the Labour Law before the competent authority/Court.

That being so, this application is permitted to be withdrawn with the aforementioned liberty.

(Mihir Kumar Jha, J) Ranjan/- U