Patna High CourtCR. MISC./11458/2017bail granted

Mritunjay Kumar @ Mirtunjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-04-04Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.11458 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -71 Year- 2014 Thana -KAHALGAON District- BHAGALPUR ======================================================

1. Mritunjay Kumar @ Mirtunjay Kumar Son of Suresh Das Resident of Village-Badi Zamin, P.S. Goradih District Bhagalpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shiwesh Chandra Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ram Priya Saran Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 04-04-2017 Heard the parties.

This application has been filed in connection with Kahalgaon P.S.Case No.71 of 2014 for the offence under Sections 406, 409, 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has nothing to do with the transaction of money in the present case as he has never introduced the person with the main accused person, as such, no case is made out against him. He is in custody since 08.01.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11458 of 2017 (3) dt.04-04-2017 2/2 Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Bhagalpur in connection with Kahalgaon P.S.Case No.71 of 2014.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U