Guddu Yadav @ Niranjan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13853 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-77 Year-2023 Thana- MALI District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Guddu Yadav @ Niranjan Yadav S/o Chandradeo Yadav Resident of VillageBishai, P.S.- Mali, District- Aurangabad (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Bhaskar Shankar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 06-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Mali P.S. Case No. 77 of 2023 instituted for the offences under Sections 302/34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3.
Prosecution case, in short, is that the petitioner has fired upon the father of the informant, due to which he died on the spot.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is submitted that there is case and counter case between the parties and parties are agnates. It is alleged that petitioner has fired upon the father of the informant. Charge-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13853 of 2024(2) dt.06-03-2024 2/2 sheet has been submitted in this case. The petitioner is in custody since 23-08-2023, and has one criminal antecedent 5.
Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. Learned APP further submits that there is specific allegation against the petitioner that he has fired upon the father of the informant. It is submitted that postmortem report corroborates the allegation levelled in the FIR.
6.
Considering the nature of accusation against the petitioner and the gravity of the offence, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer is rejected. The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T