← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./12746/2026bail granted

Samir Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-24Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12746 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-507 Year-2025 Thana- PURNEA SADAR District- Purnia ====================================================== Samir Kumar Son of Sri Surendra Mohan Thakur Resident of village - Sarra, Garhbanaili, P.S.- Kasba, District - Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amit Kumar Anand, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 24-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 507 of 2025 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that total 741 litres of liquor was recovered from parcel van. It is also alleged that, during course of vehicle checking, when the police signalled the vehicle to stop, the driver of the vehicle tried to run over the police force and tried to escape by climbing the vehicle on divider.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12746 of 2026(2) dt.24-02-2026 2/3 petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner is in no manner connected with the vehicle in question or the alleged recovery of liquor. The petitioner is in custody since 12.12.2025 and has five criminal antecedents. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 507 of 2025, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be the petitioner's own or a close family member.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12746 of 2026(2) dt.24-02-2026 3/3 fixed during the trial and shall not remain absent on two consecutive dates without sufficient cause.

(III) The petitioner shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence or influence/intimidate any witness during the course of trial.

(IV) The petitioner shall not commit any offence of a similar nature in future.

In case of violation of any of the aforesaid conditions, the Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T