Chhotu Chaudhari @ Garwa v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.15306 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -86 Year- 2016 Thana -JEHANABAD RAIL P.S. District- GAYA ======================================================
1. Chhotu Chaudhari @ Garwa Son of Sanjay Chaudhari Resident of Village- Madarpur utta, P.S. Jehanabad, District- Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri N.K.Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-04-2017 Heard the parties.
This application has been filed in connection with Jehanabad Rail P.S.Case No.86 of 2016 for the offence under Sections 411, 457, 380 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been made accused in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused and also the petitioner has clean antecedent. He has remained in custody for about three months. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of having clean antecedent of the petitioner and implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused, as such let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15306 of 2017 (2) dt.06-04-2017 2/2 bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Railway, Gaya in connection with Jehanabad Rail P.S.Case No.86 of 2016. With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T