Ram Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12329 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2022 Thana- GHANSHYAMPUR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.

RAM YADAV Son of Ram Bilash Yadav R/v- Baghras, P.S.- Ghanshyampur, District- Darbhanga 2.

LAXMAN YADAV Son of Ram Bilash Yadav R/v- Baghras, P.S.- Ghanshyampur, District- Darbhanga 3.

SHRAVAN YADAV Son of Ram Pukar Yadav R/v- Baghras, P.S.- Ghanshyampur, District- Darbhanga 4.

ARUN YADAV Son of Ram Chandra Yadav @ Ram Chanda Yadav R/vBaghras, P.S.- Ghanshyampur, District- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Girish Chandra Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bishweshwar Ram ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 18-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 427 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act pending in the learned court below. Prosecution case in brief, all the accused persons armed with deadly weapons attacked the house of the informant and damaged a vehicle and assaulted the ladies of the house. It is further alleged that they have snatched Rs. 2,00,000/- from the daughter in law of the informant. Upon received above information the informant ran towards his house. He has also been attacked the accused persons.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12329 of 2023(2) dt.18-05-2023 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. He submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioners. He further submits that petitioners have enjoyed the benefit of Section 41(A) of the Cr.P.C. He further submits that petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.

Learned APP for the State opposes for prayer for bail. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners and the fact that there is no specific overt act against the petitioners, named above, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court below, where the case is pending/Successor court, in connection with Ghanshyampur P.S. Case No.86/2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T