← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./12001/2019rejected

Indrajeet Thakur @ Indra Kumar Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

2019-05-07Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12001 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-23 Year-2017 Thana- LADANIA District- Madhubani ====================================================== INDRAJEET THAKUR @ INDRA KUMAR THAKUR, Son of Ram Chandra Thakur, Resident of Village - Dubarbona, Ward No. 1, P.S. - Laukhaha (Lalmaniya), Distt. - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajit Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 07-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 360, 361, 363, 363(A) and 366 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is that he kidnapped to the wife of the informant. The victim lady has supported the allegation, in her statement, under Section 164 Cr.P.C., that the petitioner forcefully married with her and was in physical relation with her.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that, in fact, both sides are relations and petitioner is not behaving well with his wife, who is sister of the complainant. For that reason, just to pressurize, false case has been lodged.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12001 of 2019(3) dt.07-05-2019 2/2 Petitioner is in custody since 01.10.2018.

Considering the nature of allegation which has been supported by the victim lady, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Ladaniya Police Station Case No. 23 of 2017 vide CRI No. 180/17 pending in the court of learned 4th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani. Hence, prayer for bail is refused.

Leaned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within a period of nine months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. (Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/- U