Chanchal Devi @ Kunti Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11480 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-88 Year-2021 Thana- GAURICHAK District- Patna ====================================================== CHANCHAL DEVI @ KUNTI DEVI WIFE OF KESHWAR MANJHI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- HANDER MUSHARI, MANOHARPUR TOLA, POLICE STATION- GAURICHAK, DISTRICT- PATNA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jay Ram Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Gaurichak P.S. Case No. 88/2021 registered for the offence under Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.

The petitioner has been found involved in selling of liquor.

In view of the fact that prima facie a case under the Excise Act, is made out against the petitioner, this application for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is not maintainable

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11480 of 2022(2) dt.01-04-2022 2/2 in view of Full Bench decision of this Court rendered in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2019(2) P.L.J.R. 1089 (F.B.).

Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not maintainable.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Saif/- U T