← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./11330/2026bail granted

Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-07-24Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11330 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-177 Year-2025 Thana- RAJAPAKAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Vikash Kumar S/o Ramanand Paswan @ Rama Paswan R/o Village- Bahuara Baranti, P.S- Rajapakar, Dist- Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Ayushi Gupta, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-07-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126, 115(2), 109, 74, 303(2), 324(4), 352 and 351(2) of BNS, 2023.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent. It is next submitted that FIR is instituted against 11 named accused persons and 2025 unknown accused and the informant alleges that the accused persons assaulted him and his family members and on account of assault, his daughter also received injury on head and accused took away Rs. 20,000/-.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11330 of 2026(2) dt.24-07-2026 2/3 Sakaldeep Paswan and Mithun Kumar had approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc. No.53665 of 2025 and the same came to be allowed by an order dated 20.08.2025. It is further submitted that case of the petitioner is also similar to the case of Sakaldeep Paswan and Mithun Kumar as no specific allegation of assault is alleged against him. It is next submitted that if privilege of anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner, the petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Rajapakar P.S. Case No. 177 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

7. However, it is made clear that in the event if the Investigating Officer of the case files an application before the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11330 of 2026(2) dt.24-07-2026 3/3 learned Trial Court bringing to its notice that petitioner despite giving assurance to this Court is not co-operating in the investigation, in that event the learned Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T