Patna High CourtCR. MISC./21494/2026bail rejected

Deelip Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-07-15Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21494 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-168 Year-2025 Thana- PANDARAK District- Patna ====================================================== Deelip Kumar S/o- Suresh Yadav @ Suresh Singh Residence of VillageHemjapur P.S.-Khusrupur District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bablu Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 15-07-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Pandarak P.S. Case no.168 of 2025 registered under section 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, two country made pistols of which one was loaded and two live cartridges were recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Other accused managed to escape. It is further stated that on information provided by the petitioner, three other country made pistols and 16 more live cartridges were recovered.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no incriminating article has been recovered from the petitioner's

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21494 of 2026(3) dt.15-07-2026 2/2 possession who has been falsely implicated in the case. The petitioner is in custody since 29.9.2025 and chargesheet has been submitted. He has no criminal antecedent.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioner in the FIR according to which two country made pistols of which one was loaded and two live cartridges were recovered together with the recovery as stated above on the information given by the petitioner, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail for the present and the application is rejected.

7. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after six months.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U T