Rajaram @ Raja Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10567 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-148 Year-2024 Thana- TEGHRHA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Rajaram @ Raja Kumar Son of Yogendra Das @ Jogendra Das Resident of Village - Daniyalpur, Ward No.- 5, Ravi Das Tola, P.S.- Teghra, District - Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amar Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 14-02-2025 Heard Mr. Amar Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Shailendra Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 148 of 2024, F.I.R. dated 25.05.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 447, 341, 342, 323, 307, 354, 379, 384, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that accused persons including the petitioner having armed with lathi, danda and iron rod came at the house of the informant and started abusing and started assaulting and demanded rangdari Rs. 50,000/- and when the informant's husband protested his demand then accused Raja picked him up and thrown down and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10567 of 2025(2) dt.14-02-2025 2/3 started pressing his neck by sitting on his chest with intention to kill. Accused persons took out of Rs. 5000/-, snatched golden chain tried to outrage modesty of the informant and beaten them with leg and fists.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Further submits that petitioner is named in the FIR and as per allegation the petitioner assaulted to the husband of the informant and husband of the informant received the injury. Further submits that the injury report suggest that the injuries is grievous in nature. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner next submits that the date of occurrence is of 15.05.2024 while the FIR was instituted on 25.05.2024 after delay of ten days without giving any cogent explanation.

5. Learned APP for the State, on the other hand vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that it appears from the FIR that there is direct allegation against the petitioner that he has assaulted the husband of the informant and injury report suggests that injuries are grievous in nature (Intracranial Hemorrhage).

6. Considering the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to giving privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10567 of 2025(2) dt.14-02-2025 3/3 connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 148 of 2024 pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai.

7. Prayer is refused.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Prakash Narayan U T