← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./11109/2022allowed

Mohit Kumar @ Rohit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-08-03Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11109 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-80 Year-2021 Thana- MUSAHARI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Mohit Kumar @ Rohit Kumar S/O Umesh Paswan R/O Village- Chandwara, Jail Chowk (Paswan Tola), Bandh Road, P.S.- Town, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Alok Kumar Alok For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jagdhar Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 03-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504/506 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner along with six other are said to have assaulted the informant as a result of which he received head injury and fell down on the ground and got unconscious. They also taken Rs. 700/- from the pocket of the informant and golden chain.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11109 of 2022(2) dt.03-08-2022 2/2 petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner in the FIR. He submits that there is specific allegation against co-accused Vinod Paswan. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Mushahari P.S. Case No. 80 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T