← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./15365/2024dismissed

Dabloo Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-05-03Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15365 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-66 Year-2022 Thana- KORHA District- Katihar ====================================================== Dabloo Singh Son of Kamal Dev Singh @ Kamal Dev Nishad Resident of Village- Sukhasan, P.S. Barari, District- Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bimal Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. This is the second attempt for bail of the petitioner as earlier such prayer was rejected by order dated 17.05.2023 in Cr. Misc. No. 22725 of 2023.

3. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Korha P.S. Case No. 66 of 2022 registered for the offence punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

4. The following order was passed on 17.05.2023 in Cr. Misc. No. 22725 of 2023 which reads as under: "Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State.

This application for grant of regular bail arises out of Korha P.S. Case No.66 of 2022 registered for the offence punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15365 of 2024(4) dt.03-05-2024 2/2 As per the F.I.R., on 10.02.2022 three miscreants intercepted the informant and took away his bag containing cash amount which was collected from different shop keepers. The coaccused disclosed the involvement of the petitioner in the crime in question.

The petitioner has five criminal antecedents.

Considering the criminal antecedents of the petitioner and the materials available on record, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner though co-accused has been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court.

Accordingly, this regular bail application is dismissed. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible."

5. This Court finds no new ground to review its earlier order dated 17.05.2023.

6. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T