Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16400/2017bail granted

Vimal Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2017-05-16Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16400 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -57 Year- 2016 Thana -RAJIVNAGAR District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Vimal Chaudhary, S/o Sri Ramesh Chaudhary, R/v- Rajeev Nagar, Road No.-26, Ghurdaur Road, P.S. Rajeev Nagar, Distt.- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nityanand Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 307, 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The allegation of commission of dowry death by pouring kerosene oil and burning the victim is against the motherin-law Lalo Devi and sister Jyoti Kumari. The petitioner is the husband of the victim-lady.

Submission of the petitioner is that Jyoti Kumari has already been allowed bail as she was a juvenile. It appears that prosecution evidence is already going on and the witnesses examined including the informant have not supported the allegation of demand of dowry and torture for

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16400 of 2017 (3) dt.16-05-2017 2/2 the same.

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-IX, Patna/successor Court in connection with Sessions Trial No. 661 of 2016 arising out of Rajeev Nagar Police Station Case No. 57 of 2016, G.R. No. 1588 of 2016, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/- U T