Mohit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10734 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-471 Year-2024 Thana- RAJAOLI District- Nawada ====================================================== Mohit Kumar S/o- Rajesh Saw resident of Village- Mahsai PS- Rajauli DistNawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate Mr. Kumud Kishore, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 07-03-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending his arrest in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case no.471 of 2024, registered under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2) and 109 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is said to have resorted to firing resulting in gunshot injury in the leg of the father of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. Referring to the injury report brought on record as Annexure-2 to the petition, it is submitted that there is no gunshot injury in the leg.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10734 of 2025(2) dt.07-03-2025 2/2 It is further submitted that a number of co-accused have been enlarged on anticipatory bail. The petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the case/trial.

5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the direct allegation against the petitioner in the F.I.R wherein he is said to have resorted to firing resulting in gunshot injury in the leg of the informant together with mention of the injury report in the order of the learned Court below wherein corresponding gunshot injury has been found, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail and the application is rejected.

7. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the learned Court below within a period of four weeks.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Shiv/- U T