Harinath Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.421 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19278 of 2018 ====================================================== Harinath Ray S/o Late Narayan Ray, Resident of Village and P.O.- Marue, P.S.- Patepur, District- Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Patna, namely Brajesh Malhotra. 2.

The Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur, namely Pankaj Kumar.

3.

The District Magistrate-cum- Collector, Vaishali, namely Yashpal Meena. 4.

The Sub- Divisional Officer, Mahua, District- Vaishali, namely Sandip Kumar.

5.

The Executive Magistrate, Mahua, District- Vaishali, namely Poonam Kumari.

6.

The Circle Officer, Patepur, District Vaishali namely Munna Kumar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijaya Laxmi Srivastwa, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dhurjati Kumar Prasad (GP-14) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 28-11-2025 The learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that the encroachment in question has already stood removed, however it is the complaint of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the encroacher is again trying to encroach the land in question, hence appropriate directions be issued. 2.

Accordingly, while disposing of the present petition, I deem it fit and proper to direct the District Magistrate, Vaishali and the Senior Superintendent of Police, Vaishali to ensure that

Patna High Court MJC No.421 of 2023(6) dt.28-11-2025 2/2 the encroachment in question does not re-surface. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U