Anil Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11297 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2025 Thana- NEMDARGANJ District- Nawada ====================================================== Anil Yadav Son of Lakhan Yadav Resident of village - Teyar, P.S.- Nemdarganj, District - Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajeev Nayan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Prem Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 10-04-2026 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 74, 303(2), 351, 352(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is in custody since 17-12-2025 and the informant alleges that on 22.03.2025 at around 7 A.M. he was at his home when he heard an alarm of Gudiya Devi, accordingly he came and saw that Rahul had caught hold of her and when he objected, Anil assaulted the informant on his head by sword causing injury, thereafter Lakhan assaulted his brother Kirshna Mohan by sword on head, while Antarwa Devi snatched golden chain from Gudiya Devi.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11297 of 2026(2) dt.10-04-2026 2/2 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant on account of dispute relating to passage. It is next submitted that the petitioner's side and the informant are neighbours. It is further submitted that petitioner is alleged to have assaulted the informant by sword causing injury on head, but then the wound is lacerated as such it appears that it was caused by hard and blunt substance. It is also submitted that even presuming what has been alleged to be true without admitting then the blow is not alleged to be repeated and petitioner is not a criminal. It is next submitted that if privilege of regular bail is granted to the petitioner, the petitioner will not abscond rather will co-operate in the trial to prove his innocence. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Nemdarganj P.S. Case No.93/2025.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T