Satyendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.924 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-460 Year-2020 Thana- RAJAOLI District- Nawada ====================================================== Satyendra Yadav Son of Iswar Yadav @ Iswari Yadav R/V- Bara, PS- Rajauli Dist- Nawada ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Urmila Devi Wife of Satendar Das R/V- Satgir, PS- Rajauli, Dist- Nawada ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr.Sheo Kumar Prasad, Advocate For the State :
Mrs.Usha Kumari 1, Spl. P.P.
For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 26-04-2023 This is the second attempt of the appellant to seek bail from this Court by filing the present appeal in connection Special SC/ST Case No. 225 of 2020, arising out of Rajauli P.S. Case No. 460 of 2020.
2. In this case report was called for from the court of learned Special Judge, Exclusive Special Court, SC/ST (POA) Act, Nawada about the present stage of trial and report dated 31.03.2023 has been received, wherein the learned trial court has submitted that out of six prosecution witnesses, four have been examined and discharged. The informant, doctor and the investigating officer are yet to be examined.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he does not want to press the present appeal, if the learned trial
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.924 of 2023(5) dt.26-04-2023 2/2 court is directed to conclude the trial since the evidence of some of the witnesses have been recorded, who turned hostile and the remaining witnesses are required to be examined at the earliest.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant also submits that the learned trial court is directed to conclude the trial as soon as possible since the appellant is extending threat to the witnesses, but no document has been brought on record to prove this fact.
5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the submissions made on behalf of the parties, learned trial court is directed to take necessary steps for conclusion of the trial as early as possible preferably within a period of three months.
6. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
(Arun Kumar Jha, J) DKS/- U T