← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/622/2016disposed

Kunal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-03-15Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.622 of 2016 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 22219 of 2014 =========================================================== Kunal Kumar, Son of Shri Baiju Rai, resident of Prem Shukla Market Yadav Chowk, Hajipur, P.S. Hajipur, District Vaishali .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Mr. Amitav Kumar, son of not known to the petitioner, the District Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari.

3. Mr. Sunil Kumar, son of not known to the petitioner, the Deputy Development Commissioner, East Champaran, Motihari.

4. Mr. Rajnish Lal, son of not known to the petitioner, the Sub-Divisional Officer, Motihari

5. Mr. Kumar Mangalam, son of not known to the petitioner the Deputy Collector (Administration), Motihari.

6. Mr. Ram Ekbal Prasad, son of not known to the petitioner, Treasury Officer, East Champaran Motihari.

.... .... Opposite Parties =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Satyabir Bharti Mr. Alok Chandra, Advocates For Opposite Parties : Mr. Ravi Verma, AC to GP 4 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 15-03-2017 Heard the parties.

2. The petition has been filed alleging deliberate violation of the order of this Court dated 06.10.2015 passed in CWJC No. 22219 of 2014 requiring the authorities to consider the petitioner's case and taking decision at their end.

3. Pursuant to the order dated 22.02.2017, second supplementary show cause has been filed on behalf of the opposite parties, according to which the interest amount of Rs. 1,89,242/- has

Patna High Court MJC No.622 of 2016 dt.15-03-2017 2/2 been paid to the petitioner (Annexure-E), which is admitted by learned counsel for the petitioner.

4. In the above view of the matter, the submission of learned counsel for the opposite parties that the order of this Court stands complied is accepted.

5. MJC No. 622 of 2016 stands disposed of.

(Vikash Jain, J) B.T/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 17.03.2017 Transmission Date N.A.