Patna High CourtCR. MISC./17468/2023bail rejected

Mukesh Kumar @ Dr. Mukesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-03-22Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17468 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-390 Year-2018 Thana- NAGAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Mukesh Kumar @ Dr. Mukesh Kumar Son of Din Dayal Singh R/V- Gumati, P.S- Raja Pakar (Birati O.P) Dist- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anuj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Harendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-03-2023 Heard Mr. Anuj Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with S.Tr. No.619/2022 arising out of Hajipur Town P.S.Case No.390/2018 for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B/34 of the IPC and Sectio 16 of the BCE Act.

3. The records of the case reveals that as per the FIR, the petitioner is engaged in the business of human organs. He has no valid degree of MBBS or M.S. In the present case, specific allegation is that the child of the informant was operated by the petitioner but when his condition deteriorated, he was referred to the Patna where he was declared brought dead. The postmortem of the dead body was conducted at Sadar

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17468 of 2023(2) dt.22-03-2023 2/2 Hospital, Hajipur.

3. Learned APP has informed this Court that already four prosecution witnesses have been examined and the trial is likely to be concluded very soon.

4. Considering the fact that no fresh ground has been shown by the petitioner for the release of the petitioner on regular bail. I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage. Accordingly, the bail application of the petitioner stands rejected.

5. The trial court is directed to conclude the trial expeditiously.

(Purnendu Singh, J) chn/- U