Tahid Nafeesh v. The State Of Bihar, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Bihar, Patna

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2511 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-234 Year-2018 Thana- MANJHI District- Saran ====================================================== Tahid Nafeesh, Son of Nafishul Hasan, Resident of Village- Ratsar Kalan, Ratsar Road, P.O.- Ratsar Kalan, P.S.- Gardwar, District- Ballia (U.P.). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Secretary-cum-Commissioner (Excise), Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra.

4. The Superintendent of Police, Chapra.

5. The S.H.O. Manjhi Police Station, District- Saran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Md. Aslam Ansari For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Kumar Manish (Sc5) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 12-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

Petitioner has prayed for provisional release of the vehicle (Mahindra & Mahindra Class Motor Car) bearing registration no. UP-60Z-7001, which has been seized by the police in connection with Manjhi P. S. Case No. 234 of 2018 for the offence under Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

It is alleged that 198 liters of illicit liquor have been recovered from the vehicle in question.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by the terms and

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.2511 of 2018(2) dt.12-10-2018 2/3 conditions which may be imposed by this Court for provisional release of the vehicle in question. It is further submitted that no confiscation proceeding has been initiated in respect of the vehicle in question.

In view of the views expressed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court, considering the quantity of the illicit liquor being more than 30 liters, pending initiation/finalization of confiscation proceeding, this Court would direct provisional release of the vehicle in question on petitioner producing document of ownership and registration in his name and furnishes two sureties (one local) along with a bank guarantee for the value of the vehicle in question as indicated in the insurance document to the satisfaction of the court below.

The order of provisional release is, however, subject to the further undertakings to be submitted by the petitioner before the court below as follows:

(i) That the vehicle in question is not involved in any other offence of similar nature in past and shall not be involved in the nature of the offence in future.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not create any third party right or interest in respect of the vehicle in question.

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.2511 of 2018(2) dt.12-10-2018 3/3 (iii) That the petitioner shall produce the vehicle as and when required by the learned court below/authority concerned.

Prior to release of the vehicle a Panchnama shall be prepared which will be kept on record for future use in course of trial.

The vehicle be released within one week from the date of furnishing surety and the undertakings as indicated above.

The application stands disposed off.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) avin/- U T