← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./11220/2022allowed

Deepak Narayan Singh @ Dipak Narayan Singh @ Deepak Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-29Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11220 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-214 Year-2020 Thana- NAWANAGAR District- Buxar ====================================================== DEEPAK NARAYAN SINGH @ DIPAK NARAYAN SINGH @ DEEPAK KUMAR SINGH S/o Jaynath Singh Resident of Village- Pawarpur, Nawanagar, District- Buxar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Dipti Rai (Singh), son of Late Ramjanam Singh, resident of village Karwaniya, P.S. Nawanagar, District Buxar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anand Vardhan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Rina Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 29-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State but in spite of valid service of notice none has appeared on behalf of opposite party no.2.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 406/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioner is that he took Rs.7.50 lacs from opposite party no.2, who is father-in-law of the petitioner, for purchasing a vehicle but in spite of several requests he did not return the same.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11220 of 2022(4) dt.29-01-2024 2/2 falsely implicated in this case due to memory loss and misunderstanding of the informant as he is a very old man. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the fact that there is money dispute which is civil in nature and the petitioner is the son-in-law of the informant, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Nawanagar P.S. Case No. 214 of 2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T