Parshuram Pandey v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10699 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-266 Year-2024 Thana- KHAIRA District- Saran ====================================================== Parshuram Pandey S/o- Late Dharikshan Pandey Village- Patedah Ps- Khaira Dist- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bindhyachal Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. Vipin Kr. Singh, Advocate Mr. Nikhil Kr. Singh, Advocate Mrs.Vaishnavi Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Mithlesh Kumar Khare,APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2025
1. Heard Mr. Bindhyachal Singh, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Khaira P.S. Case no.266 of 2024 registered under sections 109 and 61(2) of the B.N.S, Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. The allegations in the F.I.R is that the informant was shot at by two unknown persons who were on a motorcycle who had concealed their identity and in the later portion of the F.I.R suspicion has been raised on the petitioner on the account of an earlier dispute.
4. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. It
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10699 of 2025(3) dt.08-05-2025 2/3 would be apparent from the F.I.R itself that the name of the petitioner has been included in the F.I.R on the basis of suspicion on account of an earlier dispute. As a matter of fact the petitioner and the informant are the resident of same village and are known to each other. It is further submitted that during the course of investigation, the picture of the petitioner does not show in the CCTV footage. The petitioner is a retired military personnel and no material has come to connect the petitioner in the alleged crime. The petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the case/trial.
5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State by stating that the petitioner has been made an accused in four cases of similar nature. In response, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that out of four cases, he is on bail in one case and he is acquitted in other three cases.
6. In view of the entire facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Khaira P.S. Case no.266 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10699 of 2025(3) dt.08-05-2025 3/3 Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Saran at Chapra, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S, 2023. (Soni Shrivastava, J) Harsh/- U T