Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4714/2017bail granted

Subodh Kumar @ Subodh Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-14Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4714 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -118 Year- 2016 Thana -WAJIRGANJ District- GAYA ====================================================== Subodh Kumar @ Subodh Prasad, sons of Sri Suresh Yadav, resident of village Budhaul, P.S.- Wazirganj, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Yugal Kishore, Sr. Advocate Mr. Sanjay, Advocate Mr. Virendra Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 14-02-2017 This is an application for grant of bail for offences punishable under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that allegation against petitioner is that he had withdrawn articles under food and security scheme for distribution but without distributing those articles he had sold in the market. But on verification of the record, it is found up-to-date and he is in custody for about three months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that he has remained in custody for about three months and has no criminal antecedent, let above named petitioner be enlarged on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4714 of 2017 (2) dt.14-02-2017 2/2 bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Wazirganj P.S. Case no.118 of 2016 with the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned. (ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudip/- U T