Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10707/2020dismissed

Ripu Sah @ Rippu Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2021-02-08Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10707 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2019 Thana- RAMNAGAR District- West Champaran ====================================================== RIPU SAH @ RIPPU SAH Son of Ram Ashish Sah Resident of Village - Sohsa, P.S.- Ram Nagar, District - West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Kr Singh No. 1 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Narendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-02-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Ram Nagar P.S. Case No. 83 of 2019 instituted for the offences under Sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture and thereafter caused death of the victim due to nonfulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 27.5.2019 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. Charge-sheet has been submitted in the present case. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner is named in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10707 of 2020(3) dt.08-02-2021 2/2 F.I.R.. There is no eye witness to the alleged occurrence. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/complaint case. The petitioner is the husband of the deceased. The onus is on him to explain the cause of death of deceased. There is mark on the neck of the deceased which resulted to her death.

Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Prayer is rejected. The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial at the earliest preferably within a period of nine months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T