Sushila Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21399 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-174 Year-2020 Thana- JADOPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.
SUSHILA DEVI W/o Vidya Yadav @ Vidya Chaudhary Resident of VillageNawada, P.S.- Yadopur, District- Gopalganj. 2.
Guddu Yadav S/o- Vidya Yadav @ Vidya Chaudhary Resident of VillageNawada, P.S.- Yadopur, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Harendra Prasad, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 29-11-2021 Let the defects, if any, be removed within four weeks of the complete start of the physical Court.
Heard the parties.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
Submission is that recovery of liquor is alleged from behind the house of the petitioners. The place of recovery is accessible by anyone. Petitioners have got no criminal antecedent.
Considering the facts aforesaid, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21399 of 2021(2) dt.29-11-2021 2/2 Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Yadopur P.S. Case No. 174 of 2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as subject to the following conditions:
(a) The petitioners shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioners. (b) Both the bailors shall be the resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below (c) The petitioners shall not leave the country without permission of the trial Court.
(Birendra Kumar, J) mantreshwar/- U T