Aryan Kumar @ Vivek Kumar @ Chhotka Vivek @ Aryan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11093 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-627 Year-2024 Thana- DANAPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Aryan Kumar @ Vivek Kumar @ Chhotka Vivek @ Aryan S/o- Pintu Ray R/o- Kharanjan Road State Boring P.s- Danapur Dist-Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ghanshyam Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 18-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No. 627 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution in short is that the marriage of the informant was solemnized in the year 2019 with one Manoj Kumar @ Jitendra. On 12.07.2024, when the husband of the informant was returning at 07:00 P.M., it is alleged that unknown miscreants have killed the husband of the informant.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11093 of 2026(2) dt.18-02-2026 2/2 submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR rather his name has come on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused namely, Rohit Kumar. Save and except the confessional statement, there is nothing against the petitioner. He further submits that other co-accused persons have already been granted bail by this court vide Cr. Misc. No. 45645 of 2025 and 78197 of 2025. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 23.05.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of three cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-I, Danapur, Patna in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No. 627 of 2024.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T