← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/22278/2018dismiss for nonprosecution

Ram Sakal Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2025-10-14Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22278 of 2018 ====================================================== Ram Sakal Singh S/o Late Mulchand Singh, R/o Village- Mohiuddinpur, P.S. Fatuha, District-Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The District Magistrate, Patna.

3.

The District Land Acquisition Officer, Patna. 4.

The Addl. District Land Acquisition Officer, Patna. 5.

The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms Patna City Patna. 6.

The Circle Officer, Fatuha, Patna.

7.

The Chairman, Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Reestablishment Tribunal, Baldeo Bhavan, Patna 8.

Yogendra Rai.

9.

Wakil Rai Both Sons of Ram Lakhan rai. Both are Resident of VillageMohiuddinpur, P.S. Fatuha, District-Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the State :

Mr. Raj Ballabh Pd. Yadav, AAG-11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 14-10-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s):

"to direct the respondents particularly the District Land Acquisition Officer, Patna to give the total amount of compensation amounting to Rs.2,54,097/- and to direct the respondents to enhance the rate of compensation as per the new rate as amendment made in the Provisions."

Patna High Court CWJC No.22278 of 2018(2) dt.14-10-2025 2/2

3. A counter affidavit has come according to which the matter has been referred to Land Acquisition, Resettlement and Rehabilitation Authority, Patna for deciding the Title and Claim of the petitioner vide letter no. 2711 dated 26.01.2016.

4. The copy of the counter affidavit was served upon the petitioner on 02.04.2018 and and there is no rebuttal.

5. This Court is convinced that since the matter has been referred to LARRA, no further order can be passed.

6. However, since there is no appearance, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. (Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U