Anil Singh Yadav @ Anil Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12077 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-472 Year-2024 Thana- RAMGARH District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== ANIL SINGH YADAV @ ANIL YADAV S/O JANG BAHADUR SINGH YADAV R/O VILLAGE- AKHINI P.S- NUAON , DISTRICT- KAIMUR BHABUA AT PRESENT GHANA KHAMARIA SONPUR ROAD, PANAGAR, P.S.- GHANA, DISTRICT- JABALPUR, STATE- MADHYA PRADESH ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vinod Kumar Seth, Advocate Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate Ms. Sunila Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 22-03-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending his arrest in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case no. 472 of 2024 registered under section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

3. As per the prosecution case, on the informant signaling the motorcycle in question to stop, it is stated that the two accused persons who were on the motorcycle abandoned the same and managed to escape. On search 52 litres of liquor was recovered.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case only for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12077 of 2025(2) dt.22-03-2025 2/2 reason that he happens to be the registered owner of the vehicle in question. No incriminating article has been recovered from his possession and he has no criminal antecedent.

5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioner in the F.I.R., the petitioner not having been arrested at the spot and especially his not having any antecedent under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, it is directed that the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case no. 472 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge Excise-II, Kaimur at Bhabua.

(Partha Sarthy, J) avinash/- U T