← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9750/2020disposed

Ashok Kumar Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2020-03-03Mr. Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9750 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-886 Year-2019 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR SADAR DistrictMuzaffarpur ====================================================== ASHOK KUMAR CHAUDHARY, Son of Ram Lakhan Chaudhary, Resident of Village - Satpura Durga Asthan, P.S. - Kazimohammadpur, District - Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravi Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anish Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-03-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the I.P.C. and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, as amended by Amendment Act 8 of 2018. The prosecution case as per the written report of Sanjay Kumar Singh, A.S.I submitted before the S.H.O., Sadar Police Station is to the effect that a motorcycle bearing registration No. BR-06N-1210 was intercepted when the driver of the motorcycle escaped from the scene and 1.80 litre of Indian Made Foreign Liquor was recovered from the motorcycle. The petitioner is the owner of the motorcycle in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9750 of 2020(2) dt.03-03-2020 2/2 question.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the said recovery has not been made from the possession of the petitioner. A statement has been made in paragraph no.3 of the petition that the petitioner is not having any criminal antecedent.

Learned APP for the State submits that the recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner. Considering the fact that the recovery has been made from the motorcycle of the petitioner, the anticipatory bail application is not maintainable.

Let the learned Court below consider the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner and preferably dispose of the same on the same day, if the petitioner surrenders within a period of six weeks, in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 886 of 2019, pending before the learned Special Judge, Excise, Muzaffarpur..

With the above observation, this application is, accordingly, disposed of.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Ashwini/- U T