Patna High CourtCR. MISC./7960/2017bail granted

Pushpa Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-23Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7960 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -388 Year- 2016 Thana -NARPATGANJ District- ARRARIA ======================================================

1. Pushpa Devi, Wife of Bisheshwar Paswan @ Chhotu Paswan, resident of village - Paswan Tola Chakorwa Ward No. 6, Police Station - Narpatganj ( Bathnaha ), District - Araria .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajeev Nayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 23-02-2017 Heard the parties.

This application has been filed in connection with Narpatganj (Bathnaha) Police Station Case No.388 of 2016 for the offence under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that except the confessional statement, there is nothing against the petitioner and she is in custody for about four months and even as per the confessional statement, she has not participated in the alleged occurrence.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides. In view of the fact that except the confessional statement, there is nothing against the petitioner and she has remained in custody for about four months, let the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7960 of 2017 (2) dt.23-02-2017 2/2 petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Araria in connection with Narpatganj (Bathnaha) Police Station Case No.388 of 2016.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U