Patna High CourtCWJC/18445/2016dismissed

Sujeet Tiwary And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-11-19Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18445 of 2016 ===========================================================

1. Sujeet Tiwary son of Late Krishna Kumar Tiwary, resident of MohallaBhagirathi Lane, Mahendru, Police Station- Sultanganj, District- Patna.

2. Rajiva Ranjan Gupta son of Raghubir Singh, resident of Raghubir Sadan, Mohalla- Chandmari, P.S.- Motihari, District- Motihari. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Home (Special) Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. Deputy Secretary, Home (Special) Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Finance Commissioner, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. Chief of Controller of Audit (Account), Secretariat, Patna.

5. The Controller of Accounts, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

6. The Deputy Controller of Accounts, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

7. State of Jharkhand through the Commissioner, Finance Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi.

8. Union of India through the Deputy Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievance & Pension, Government of India, New Delhi.

9. Deputy Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievance & Pension, Government of India, New Delhi.

.... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Manish Kumar No-2, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Dhruba Mukherjee, Senior Advocate State of Jharkhand Mr. Nazir Ansari, Advocate CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 19-11-2016 Heard counsel for the petitioner and learned Senior Counsel for the respondent State of Jharkhand. Annexure-5 is dated 17.10.2016 by virtue of which the two petitioners have been asked to report and join at Jharkhand their allotted cadre.

This issue was earlier raised by the petitioners in a previous writ application. The Court had very clearly and

Patna High Court CWJC No.18445 of 2016 dt.19-11-2016 2/2 categorically negated their prayer by virtue of Annexure-3 dated 23.04.2015.

Annexure-5, the order impugned, is the natural corollary to Annexure-3 as well as a policy of the Central Government with regard to the cadre transfer between two States. No interference is, therefore, warranted with Annexure5. Writ stands dismissed. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) Pawan/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 19.11.2016 Transmission Date N/A