← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13332/2026bail rejected

Ekram Mian @ Md. Ekram @ Ikram Miyan @ Md. Ikram v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-03Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13332 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-325 Year-2024 Thana- RAMGARHWA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Ekram Mian @ Md. Ekram @ Ikram Miyan @ Md. Ikram S/o Kamaruddin Miya @ Manjur Miyan R/o Village- Belahiya, (Sigasani Tola Binvaliya), PSRamgarhwa, District- East Champaran, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rudrank Shivam Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Ramgarhwa P. S. Case No. 325 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8(C), 20(B) ii (C), 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.

3. As per F.I.R., 287.55 quintal Ganja was recovered from the house of co-accused Kamrul Hoda, who disclosed the name of this petitioner as one of his associates.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. No incriminating material has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner and he is no way connected with the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13332 of 2026(2) dt.03-04-2026 2/2 aforesaid recovery. Petitioner is in custody since 18.09.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that petitioner has got one criminal antecedent of similar nature.

6. Considering the huge quantity of recovery and criminal antecedent of similar nature, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.

7. However, since petitioner is in custody since 18.09.2025, Trial Court is directed to expedite and conclude the trial, preferably, within a period of one year from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T