Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19784/2023bail granted

Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Pratap v. The State Of Bihar

2023-08-02Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19784 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-332 Year-2022 Thana- DAUDNAGAR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Pratap, Son Of Krishna Choudhary R/V- Belwan Kothi, P.S.- Daud Nagar, District- Aurangabad (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ramanuj Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-08-2023

1. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to remove the defects as pointed out by the office during course of the day.

2. Permission is accorded.

3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

4. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 323, 353, 307, 186, 427, 435, 290, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that accused persons including the petitioner along with 500 unknown were protesting against the Agni Path Scheme of the Government and damaged police vehicle and public property and the mob the led by Nawlesh Yadav, Santosh

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19784 of 2023(2) dt.02-08-2023 2/2 Yadav and Sumit Yadav.

6. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R., it would manifest that no specific allegation is alleged against the petitioner and other allegations are general and omnibus in nature.

7. Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.

8. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Daudnagar, Aurangabad in connection with Daudnagar P. S. Case No.332 of 2022, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

9. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T