Mukesh Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.10590 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -146 Year- 2016 Thana -TARAPUR District- MUNGER ====================================================== Mukesh Chaudhary, son of Ram Khelawan Chaudhary, resident of Village- Khanpur, P.S. Tarapur, District- Munger. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Harendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Tarapur P.S.Case No. 146 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2016.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and remained in custody for about three months and the alleged recovery is of six litres of foreign liquor.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the submission as above, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10590 of 2017 (2) dt.22-03-2017 2/2 thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Munger, in connection with Tarapur P.S.Case No. 146 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U