Sanjeet Kumar Ram v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13757 of 2017 (2) dt.12-04-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13757 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -306 Year- 2015 Thana -SAMASTIPUR MUFFASIL DistrictSAMASTIPUR ====================================================== Sanjeet Kumar Ram son of Amiri Ram, R/o village- Satmalpur Bara Tole (Lilia Gachhi), P.S.- Warisnagar, District- Samastipur.......... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijay Bhushan Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Damodar Prasad Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 12-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected vide order dated 06.05.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 12860 of 2016, on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 30.12.2015 and up-till now charge has not been framed and as such there is no scope of early conclusion of trial though there was direction to conclude the trial preferably within nine months. Co-accused Guddu Mahto in whose confessional statement name of the petitioner transpired has already been allowed bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 37304 of 2016 by another co-ordinate Bench of this Court and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration.

Learned APP fairly submits that Guddu Mahto who has

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13757 of 2017 (2) dt.12-04-2017 earlier confessed his guilt and has been allowed bail. In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Samastipur in S. T. No. 293 of 2016 arising out of Samastipur Mufasil P.S. Case No. 306 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T