Shyamchandra Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12008 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-623 Year-2021 Thana- RUNISAIDPUR District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.
SHYAMCHANDRA TIWARI Son of Chalitar Tiwari Resident of VillageMehsaul Tola,- Chaupar Kala, P.S.- Runnisaidpur, District- Sitamarhi. 2.
Usha Kumari W/o Shyamchandra Tiwari Resident of Village- Mehsaul Tola,- Chaupar Kala, P.S.- Runnisaidpur, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. N.K Agarwal, Sr. Advocate Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Rita Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 12-09-2022 Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 498(A), 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned senior counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that she was married to Keshav Tiwari, seven years ago, further after marriage the accused persons including the petitioners, started demanding Rs. 5
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12008 of 2022(2) dt.12-09-2022 2/3 lakh for the business of her husband and also abused and assaulted her, it is also alleged that out of the wedlock a child was also born but on account of non-fulfillment of demand of dowry, the informant was harassed and threatened that her husband would be easily married. Learned senior counsel for the petitioners submits that from tenor of allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the dispute basically was between the informant and her husband in which the entire family members came to be implicated, it is next submitted that petitioners are father-in-law and mother-in-law of the informant and it is the duty of the husband to ensure that the wife lives with dignity and honour.
Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12008 of 2022(2) dt.12-09-2022 3/3 amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No. 623 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Shivam/- U T