Patna High CourtCWJC/929/2014allowed

Shiv Kishor Kamat v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-02-23Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.929 of 2014 ===========================================================

1. Shiv Kishor Kamat Son Of Late Khushi Lal Kamat Resident Of Village - Alola, P.S. Ghoghardiha, District - Madhubani .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar, Through The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

2. Director ( Madhyamik Shiksha ), Education Department, Govt. Of Bihar

3. Director ( State Project ) Bihar Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad, Bihar, Patna

4. The Managing Director, Bihar State Educational Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. ( Bseidc Ltd. ) Shiksha Bhawan, Acharya Shiv Pujan Sahay Path Saidpur, Patna - 4

5. The District Collector, Madhubani

6. The District Education Officer, Madhubani 7.

The District Programme Officer, ( Rastriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan/Madhyamik Shiksha ) Madhubani

8. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Madhubani

9. The Block Education Extension Officer Ghoghardiha, P.S. Ghoghardiha, District - Madhubani .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. YOGENDRA KUMAR For the Respondent State : Mr. ANJANI KUMAR For respondents 3 and 4: Mr. GIRIJESH KUMAR. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 23-02-2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The Director, Secondary Education, Government of Bihar now must take a decision and issue appropriate direction for upgradation of the school at Alola since it is evident from the sanction granted earlier by the authorities that the school at Basuara does not have land and infra structure for up-gradation. Since there is unanimity among the officials and the

Patna High Court CWJC No.929 of 2014 dt.23-02-2015 2/2 materials which has emerged and accepted including the counter affidavit, this writ application is allowed with direction upon the Director, Secondary Education to do the needful within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order. IA No. 8272 of 2014 has been filed for intervention. The same is rejected.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) haque/- U