Subodh Kumar Ray v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.18937 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -297 Year- 2016 Thana -TEGHRA District- BEGUSARAI ====================================================== Subodh Kumar Ray, S/o Mahendra Ray, resident of Village Chakraj Ali, P.S. Shahpur Patori, District- Samastipur.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vikramdeo Singh with Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocates For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
This is an application for bail in connection with Teghra P.S.Case No. 297 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and it appears that name of the petitioner transpires during course of investigation and the case is under Section 392 IPC.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that name of the petitioner transpires on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused and except that there is nothing against the petitioner and he is in custody for more than two months. It has also been submitted that apart from that he has been made accused in one other case also and he is on bail in that case. Heard learned APP also, who could not controvert the above submission.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18937 of 2017 (2) dt.26-04-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in connection with Teghra P.S.Case No. 297 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U