Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18940/2017bail granted

Suresh Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar

2017-05-10Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18940 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -118 Year- 2016 Thana -BHORE District- GOPALGANJ ======================================================

1. Suresh Bhagat, son of Rambriksh Bhagat, resident of VillageKalyanpur, P.S.- Bhore, District- Gopalganj. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nityanand Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Bhanu Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-05-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Bhore P.S. Case No. 118 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504/34 of Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of assault to the husband of the informant by means of dabh.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that though there is allegation against the petitioner of assault to the husband of the petitioner but the injury was found to be simple in nature. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 22.02.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the fact and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation, period of custody and also that injury was found to be simple in nature, as such, let

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18940 of 2017 (3) dt.10-05-2017 2/2 the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Gopalganj, in connection with Bhore P.S. Case No. 118 of 2016, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U