Manoj Kumar Yadav @ Manoj Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11616 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-354 Year-2025 Thana- LADANIA District- Madhubani ====================================================== Manoj Kumar Yadav @ Manoj Yadav S/o Nagendra Yadav Resident of Village - Yogia, P.S - Ladaniya, District - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Subhash Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nityanand Tiwary, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 13-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Ladaniya P.S. Case No. 354 of 2025, instituted for the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109, 132, 317(5), 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that total 225 litres of liquor was recovered from motorcycle. It is further alleged that there is recovery of two Scorpio vehicles.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11616 of 2026(2) dt.13-02-2026 2/2 that petitioner is in no manner connected with the vehicles in question or the alleged recovery of liquor. The name of the petitioner dragged in this case on the basis of discloser made by one co-accused Ram Kumar Yadav. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that general and omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has two criminal antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Ladaniya P.S. Case No. 354 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) manish/- U T