Sanjay Singh v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18034 of 2017 (2) dt.12-04-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.18034 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -61 Year- 2016 Thana -KASMA District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Sanjay Singh, Son of Late Mugeshar Singh, resident of Village- Balar, P.S.- Kasma, District- Aurangabad (Bihar).
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance:
For the Petitioner : Mr. Amarendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 12-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is in custody since 25.02.2017 in connection with Kasma P.S. Case No. 61 of 2016 for the alleged offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504/34 and later added Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and there is case and counter case between the parties. The accusations against the petitioner and other persons are general and omnibus in nature and no specific act of assault has been attributed to the petitioner, much less any injury caused at his instance. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.
4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18034 of 2017 (2) dt.12-04-2017 be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Aurangabad in connection with Kasma P.S. Case No. 61 of 2016 on the following conditions :- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT U T