Patna High CourtMJC/4290/2018disposed

Sudama Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri R. K. Mahajan, The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development

2019-09-04Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4290 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6839 of 2018 ======================================================

1. Sudama Singh, Son of Late Yogi Singh @ Late Yogendra Singh

2. Harihar Singh, son of Late Rameshwar Singh @ Rajeshwar Singh Both are Assistant Teacher (Primary Unit) of Ayodhya Shiv Narayan Sanskrit High School Bhitargharwa Muthh, P.O.- Bakhari, P.S.- Patahi, District- East Champaran ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar Through Sri R. K. Mahajan, the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. Md. Mattiur Rahman, the Special Director (Secondary Education), Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. Sri Anil Kumar, the Secretary, Bihar Sanskrit Education Board, Bihar, Patna.

4. Sri Rameshwar Singh, the Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Education Board, Bihar, Patna.

5. Sri Raj Kumar Sharma, the District Education Officer, East Champaran

6. Sri Upendra Kumar Singh, the District Programme Officer (Establishment), East Champaran

7. Smt. Anjali Devi, the Managing Committee of Ayodhya Shiv Narayan Sanskrit High School Bhitargharwa Muthh, P.O.- Bakhari, P.S.- Patahi, District- East Champaran through its Secretary,

8. Sri Arbind Kumar, the Headmaster of Ayodhya Shiv Narayan Sanskrit High School Bhitargharwa Muthh, P.O.- Bakhari, P.S.- Patahi, District- East Champaran. ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Smt. Shilpa Singh - Ga 12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 04-09-2019 In view of the fact that the claim of the petitioners is rejected by reasoned order, the contempt proceeding is dropped and disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to challenge the same in accordance with law before the appropriate forum. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) uday/- U