Bhola Chaudhur v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16500 of 2017 (2) dt.04-04-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16500 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -164 Year- 2016 Thana -SHEOHAR District- SHEOHAR ====================================================== Bhola Chaudhur, son of Ramakant Chaudhur, resident of VillageMalipokhar, Police Station- Sheohar in the district of Sheohar. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 04-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 29.09.2016 in connection with Sheohar P.S. Case No. 164 of 2016, G.R. No. 508 of 2016 for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 342, 323, 324, 326, 427/34, 307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and in any event the injuries attributed to the assault made by the petitioner upon informant and husband are all simple in nature. The occurrence is said to have resulted from an earlier petty dispute over a buffalo. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16500 of 2017 (2) dt.04-04-2017 of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheohar, in connection with Sheohar P.S. Case No. 164 of 2016, G.R. No. 508 of 2016, on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/BT U T