Guddu Singh @ Guddu Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21418 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2020 Thana- MURAR District- Buxar ====================================================== GUDDU SINGH @ GUDDU KUMAR SINGH, Son of Janardan Singh, Resident of Village - Dangauli, P.S.- Murar, Distt.- Buxar, Pin Code-802134. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Dhanendra Chaubey, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Uma Shankar Pd. Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 13-09-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual Court proceedings. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects as pointed out by the office within four weeks of normal functioning of the court, failing which the office is directed to place the matter before the Bench. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 20, 21 & 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.
Allegation against the petitioner is that 204 gram Ganja and 06 gram 500 mili gram Heroine have been recovered from the house of the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is no recovery from the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21418 of 2021(2) dt.13-09-2021 2/2 conscious possession of the petitioner. The police has recovered 204 gram Ganja and 06 gram 500 mili gram Heroine from the house of the petitioner. The petitioner was not apprehended on the place of occurrence. The said recovered Ganja is less than the small quantity and the said recovered Heroine is more than less quantity less than commercial quantity. The petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 09.11.2020. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent which is mentioned in para 3 of the bail petition.
Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail application.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Murar P.S. Case No. 92/2020 to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending/ successor Court.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) amitkumar/- U T