Patna High CourtCR. MISC./11479/2025bail granted

Rampal Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-14Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya3 pages

TIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11479 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-245 Year-2024 Thana- DHANAHA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Rampal Yadav, aged about 24 years, Male, Son of Mainejar Yadav @ Sukhal Yadav, Resident of Village- Padari Mathiya, Police Station- Lauriya, DistrictWest Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Brij Kishor Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narsingh Tanti, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 14-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Dhanaha P.S. Case No. 245 of 2024 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 331(4), 305, 324(4) of the B.N.S.S.

3. As per the prosecution case, the accused person (Rampal Yadav) stealing Rs. 14,00,000/- cash, two mobile phones and one Motorcycle bearing Registration No. BR 22BJ 4253 was seen in a CCTV footage.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that petitioner has not been seen stealing those articles as mentioned in written

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11479 of 2025(4) dt.14-05-2025 2/3 application of the informant. He further submits that petitioner was working as staff in the informant's agency and when he demanded his labour cost, he has been implicated in this case. Nothing any incriminating articles has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He next submit that the petitioner has been made scapegoat in this case due to personal grudge of the informant. He lastly submits that there is no any evidence available on the record to connect the petitioner in the alleged occurrence. Petitioner is in custody since 14.11.2024.

5. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail.

6. From perusal of the case diary, FIR and impugned order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-1st, Bagaha, West Champaran dated 08.01.2025, it appears that petitioner is named in the FIR. From perusal of the records, it appears that on the basis of written report of the informant Nandlal Gupta, FIR has been lodged under Sections 331(4), 305, 324(4) of the B.N.S.S. against the present petitioner. Petitioner has got one criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the petition is in custody since 14.11.2024. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that both parties were entered into compromise and settle the matter and a compromise petitioner has already file before the learned trial Court on 18.03.2025 and a certify

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11479 of 2025(4) dt.14-05-2025 3/3 copy of the said compromise petition is on record, so considering all these aspects of the matter, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st, Class Bagaha, West Champaran in connection with Dhanaha P.S. Case No. 245 of 2024, subject to the condition that the learned Trial Court shall verify the compromise petition before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Anand Kr.

U T