Sanjay Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.18948 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -379 Year- 2016 Thana -CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- SARAN ======================================================
1. Sanjay Ram, S/o Ram Babu Ram, Village- Bikrampur, P.S. Madhowrah Dist.- Saran at Chapra.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajani Kumari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Bharat Bhushan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 02-05-2017 Heard the parties.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Chapra Mufassil P.S. Case No.379 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 366(A) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner is that the victim used to talk to the other co-accused through the mobile of the petitioner. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case, which will appear from the statement of the victim girl made under Section 164 Cr.P.C., in which the victim has stated that only the petitioner was present along with the other co-accused, when her consciousness came back, however, the other co-accused, whose name transpired in
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18948 of 2017 (2) dt.02-05-2017 2/3 her statement, have already been granted bail by this Court, vide order dated 21.3.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No.8336 of 2017. The petitioner is in custody for about four months Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the fact that the other co-accused having similar allegation, have already been granted bail, as such, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Saran at Chapra in connection with Chapra Mufassil P.S.Case No.379 of 2016.
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/-
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18948 of 2017 (2) dt.02-05-2017 3/3 U