Patna High CourtCR. MISC./8594/2015disposed

Uma Shankar Mishra And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-05-16Mr. Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.8594 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1477 Year- 2013 Thana -EAST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- EASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Uma Shankar Mishra, son of Late Kamod Mishra

2. Lalit Narain Mishra son of Uma Shankar Mishra Both resident of village Bajajpatti Madhuban Chhawni Chowk, P.S. Town, District East Champaran.

3. Saroj Kumar @ Saroj Kumar, son of Yogendra Jha, resident of Majaura, P.S. Jhanjharpur, District Madhubani.

4. Ravi Shankar Raj son of Vijay Mishra resident of mohalla Bhawanipur Zirat, P.S. Chhatauni, District East Champaran.

5. Raj Narain Jha @ Ras Narain Jha son of late Gokul Jha resident of village Sri Krishna Nagar, P.S. Town, District East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Sujan Kumar Rai Berman son of Late Dhrub Prasad Rai Berman resident of 9/3 Hemde Lane Bermen, Kolkata - 700050 (Complainant). .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. J.N.Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. J. Thakur learned APP for the State.

The present application has been filed for quashing of the order dated 10th of April, 2014, passed by the learned CJM, Motihari, in Complaint Case No.C-1477/2013, whereby, process has been directed to be issued after cognizance being taken for the offences punishable under sections 419, 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120B/34 I.P.C.

Learned counsel for the petitioners very fairly

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8594 of 2015 (2) dt.16-05-2017 2/2 submits that the discharge petition has been rejected and the said order has been challenged in separate proceeding. Hence, the counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application.

Permission is accorded.

Accordingly, the application is disposed of as withdrawn.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Ashwini/- U