Akhilesh @ Akhilesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18934 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -212 Year- 2016 Thana -AKBARPUR District- NAWADA ====================================================== Akhilesh @ Akhilesh Yadav, son of Arjun Yadav, Resident of Village Joganna, P.S. Akbarpur, District- Nawada.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, Advocate For the Informant : Mr. Krishndeo Raj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manish Kumar 2, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Akbarpur P.S.Case No. 212 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304B, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Petitioner is elder brother of husband of the deceased and the case is under Section 304B IPC.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner and no specific overt act has been alleged and he is in custody since 3.12.2016.

Heard learned APP and learned counsel for the informant also. They could not controvert the above submission. Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18934 of 2017 (2) dt.26-04-2017 2/2 facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, in connection with Akbarpur P.S.Case No. 212 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U