← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./12048/2022bail granted

Gulshan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-06-24Mr. Justice Chandra Shekhar Jha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12048 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-208 Year-2021 Thana- MAHESHKHUNT District- Khagaria ====================================================== GULSHAN KUMAR Son of Kanhai Mandal @ Kanhayya Mandal @ Kanhay Mandal Resident of Village - Rajgangapur, P.s.- Sultanganj, Distt.- Bhgalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mrityunjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Md. Nazir Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 24-06-2022 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Maheshkhunt P.S. Case No. 208 of 2021 registered for the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 10.12.2021.

The allegation against the petitioner is to be involved in illegal transportation of illicit foreign made liquor through Tempo, wherein, a recovery of 156.6 litres was made.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12048 of 2022(2) dt.24-06-2022 2/3 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the alleged Tempo was occupied by several persons, as such, it cannot be said that the recovery of illicit liquor has been made from the physical possession of the petitioner. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is a man of clean antecedent. While concluding the argument, it has been submitted that charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.

Learned APP, while opposing the prayer of bail, fairly conceded the fact that the tempo was occupied by the several persons.

Considering the facts and circumstances as mentioned above, as recovery is not made from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner, who is man of clean antecedent coupled with the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case, let the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Maheshkhunt P.S. Case No. 208 of 2021 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special judge, Bhagalpur, subject to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12048 of 2022(2) dt.24-06-2022 3/3 the following conditions:

"(i) Accused/Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be physically present on each and every date before the Trial Court till conclusion of the trial and exemption from physical appearance be allowed by the Trial Court, only on medical ground of the petitioner duly supported by the documents.

(ii) That one of the bailors shall be Kanjay Mandal, who is the father of the petitioner and deponent of the present bail petition."

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) S.Katyayan/- U T